You are not logged in

Your report explained

 

This guide is intended to familiarise new customers with our test reports but may also be useful for existing customers to get more information out of our reports. It covers some of the frequently asked questions. However, we encourage customers to contact us directly, either by phone or email, to discuss specific issues surrounding taking samples or arising from reported results.

Remember that data included in the report should be treated as sensitive personal information and must be handled and stored appropriately.

Our result report can be split into three sections with some customer specific information at the top followed by the results and, finally, some notes (if appropriate) towards the bottom. Clearly, the most important part of the report is the results, which are presented in a table. But before we discuss them, there are a few things to point out at the top of the report.

BM report part 1

  1. This will be the person to whom results are sent, not necessarily the address of the workplace.
  2. Name of the workplace being sampled.
  3. Our reference number. This is specific to a particular report - quoting it will make enquiries about your results easier to answer.
  4. Dates that samples were collected by the customer and when they were received in the lab. Greater than expected difference between the two may indicate that samples have been delayed in the post.  This may have an impact for some analyses.

Results for each individual are reported on a separate page. They are presented in table form and, if multiple tests have been requested, the results are reported in individual columns. In addition to the test results, this part of the report contains useful information to help with the interpretation of results.

In order to meet the requirements of data protection (GDPR), we do not store individual names. Our database uniquely identifies individuals based on the company, their date of birth and a worker reference that is supplied by the customer. It can be helpful to use a consistent worker reference over time to enable easier comparison with historic data. We encourage customers to use the simplest possible system to make the process straightforward and consistent. For example, the worker reference could be the individual's initials. In rare instances where two or more individuals share the same initials and year of birth, an additional identifier, such as a number, could be used. Some customers prefer to use an alternative unique worker reference, such as employee number. Ultimately, we are happy to use whatever identifier works best for each individual client, so long as it complies with GDPR. It is the duty of the requestor to ensure compliance with data protection regulations.

BM_report_2

  1. Our lab number - specific to an individual sample, assigned when sample is received by the laboratory.
  2. Comments. e.g. high or low creatinine [1]; other specific comments as appropriate.
  3. Reference range - The level of analyte that would be expected to be found in a non-occupationally exposed population. Many chemicals are present in the environment, so we are all exposed to low-levels on a regular basis. Consequently some tests would be expected to give a background level in all individuals. The reference range is given in the same units as the reported results and, unless stated otherwise, it is normally the upper range (95th percentile) of a substance which might be expected to arise from environmental (non-occupational) exposure.  For some tests, smokers will have a higher reference range than non-smokers.  If a range applies only to smokers (S) or non-smokers (NS), it will be signified. Data is cited from "Guidance on Laboratory Techniques in Occupational Medicine".
  4. Guidance values - Given in the same units as the results, these are intended to help the interpretation of results by giving some context. There are a number of ways of developing a guidance value and there may not be a UK value for all of the substances for which we offer biological monitoring. Where available, the corresponding EU, German or US guidance value is also given. Generally, results below the guidance value would indicate that exposure is being adequately controlled. However, for carcinogens and sensitisers, the aim should be to reduce exposure as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) [2]. Where no guidance values are available, we try to provide contextual data in the form of a 90th percentile of our lab results (calculated from all of the samples tested over a recent time period, typically up to 5 years) - this is not official guidance or necessarily a safe level but what is achievable by companies using HSE for analysis.
  5. Information about the analytical technique is provided. This may be useful when comparing historical data or if results have been obtained from different laboratories.  Bear in mind that the test detection limit is often given in different units to the results. Where results are below the Detection Limit, they will be reported as ND (None Detected).

[1] Creatinine is a small molecule that is excreted as a natural by-product of metabolism. We measure it in the lab to determine how concentrated a urine sample is; so that we can correct test results for concentration. There are established 'normal' levels, but low creatinine levels can arise from drinking large volumes of fluid, while high creatinine can often occur as a result of sweating and/or low fluid intake. Levels outside the normal range are flagged on the report because creatinine correction may be less reliable at extremes of urine dilution/ concentration. Rarely, low creatinine may also indicate sample adulteration.

[2] In the absence of any guidance values, it may still be possible to set up in-house 'action-levels' for biological monitoring results. Please contact the lab for advice.

 

Finally, notes may be added to the report if appropriate, in addition to some more detailed information about the tests that have been carried out.

BM_report_3

  1. Relevant comments from the request form such as whether sample was taken pre-shift or post-shift.
  2. Where appropriate, comments may be added here by our scientists, for example if some results exceed the guidance level. If results exceed the guidance value, checking of control measures and training then retesting is usually recommended.
  3. Information about the staff who were involved in lab work and authorisation of the results.  If you wish to discuss the results, you should contact the Authorised Signatory, quoting the reference number (Our Ref).

 

 

 

UK Biomonitoring Network

Back to the top